Comment 4 for bug 651345

OK but rethinking it what will it bring us to have it internally? Why the
extra fuss?

On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Manish Sinha <email address hidden>wrote:

> Made seif agree. He was confused that the fields are public.
>
> ** Changed in: zeitgeist-sharp
> Importance: Undecided => Low
>
> ** Changed in: zeitgeist-sharp
> Status: New => Confirmed
>
> ** Changed in: zeitgeist-sharp
> Milestone: None => 0.1.0b
>
> ** Changed in: zeitgeist-sharp
> Assignee: (unassigned) => Manish Sinha (manishsinha)
>
> --
> TimeRange should have values as DateTime internally
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651345
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist
> Sharp, which is the registrant for Zeitgeist Sharp.
>
> Status in Zeitgeist Sharp: Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> TimeRange should have values as DateTime internally
>
> Internally TimeRange stores values as Int64 only. It should store as
> DateTime and return Int64 only when needed. Plus when Int64 value is
> assigned, it should convert it to DateTime.
>
> Conversion log is already implemented in ZsUtils
>
>
>

--
This is me doing some advertisement for my blog http://seilo.geekyogre.com