Comment 25 for bug 986534

Revision history for this message
Chuck Wilder (chuckw20) wrote :

@hjd #24 - Retaining the old NAME and upgrading the image to which it refers makes perfect sense and is certainly fine with me. I share your reasoning. As I have stated, though, I personally try to avoid making code modifications by myself. While this is likely a rudimentary file name change, I do not care to make assumptions about what appears to me to be an item with limited scope. In other words, as a graphician, I don't like to mess with code. Conf files are bad enough. :)