Comment 23 for bug 605799

On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Uday S Reddy <email address hidden>wrote:

> Tim Cross writes:
>
> > I notice from your definition of the above predicate that you test for
> gtk
> > for the Xemacs build as well. Does xemacs build with gtk? I'm trying to
> sort
> > out exactly what needs to be changed. The xemacs menu stuff is very
> > different to the emacs menu setup and I don't know if we need to also
> modify
> > the menu definitions for xemacs to handle gtk and non-gtk.
>
> I don't know. Since the limitation is in the GUI toolkit, I presumed
> that XEmacs might have the problem as well. We will know for sure if
> you can install XEmacs and test it. I don't have access to a machine
> running GTK.
>
> We can leave it out for now if you find it too much work. But it is
> probably best to be done with it once and for all, and instead of
> having to come back to it later.
>
> Uday,
>

as there is a job to restore the [undo] item to the menu, can I suggest that
instead, we just remove the single line that disables/undefines the standard
emacs edit menu? This will give us back the standard emacs undo, plus add
cut/paste, search, etc. Seems this would be more useful to manu users than
just a single operation and would likely fit in with what they are
accustomed to.

_______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~vm
> Post to : <email address hidden>
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~vm
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>