Comment 7 for bug 530779

In Bug #406397

Scott James Remnant wrote on 2009-12-13: #13

>On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 09:55 +0000, Lars Düsing wrote:
>
>> I'm wondering why this bug has a importance of "low", as it renders
>> using upstart for many daemons (including apache, postfix and others) as
>> impossible.
>>
>Because conversion of those daemons over to Upstart is not a priority;
>just carry on using the existing init script.

>Scott

What if someone made a daemon, want to keep it up all time, went into this bug, and ubuntu have upstart replaced inittab? What should he/she do? Any suggestion?