On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 10:39:56AM -0000, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
> For my own education (and possible future endeavours.. :-)
> could you please describe the steps/commands for this?
> And did you possibly find out how this change ended up into
> xenial buildd chroot? I couldn't match the pass/fail dates
> to livecd-rootfs/debootstrap changes; just out of curiosity.
There's a manual process to update chroots to new livefs builds, which I
executed for xenial on 2019-09-05. That was the first time that this
version of the process had been run for xenial; before that, the chroots
were hand-crafted. As such, you're not really going to get anything
interesting out of trying to correlate with archive changes in this
case.
Thanks for the verification. util-linux builds cleanly here with an
updated chroot, so I agree.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 10:39:56AM -0000, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
> For my own education (and possible future endeavours.. :-)
> could you please describe the steps/commands for this?
I'm afraid we don't have sensible docs for this yet. /dev.launchpad. net/Soyuz/ HowToUseSoyuzLo cally#Set_ up_a_builder /dev.launchpad. net/Soyuz/ HowToUseSoyuzLo cally#Drive_ builder_ through_ rpc
https:/
and
https:/
(but not necessarily the other sections of that page) are sort of part
of it but probably not sufficient to run through the whole process. We
need to document this more clearly but it's not done yet.
> And did you possibly find out how this change ended up into rootfs/ debootstrap changes; just out of curiosity.
> xenial buildd chroot? I couldn't match the pass/fail dates
> to livecd-
There's a manual process to update chroots to new livefs builds, which I
executed for xenial on 2019-09-05. That was the first time that this
version of the process had been run for xenial; before that, the chroots
were hand-crafted. As such, you're not really going to get anything
interesting out of trying to correlate with archive changes in this
case.
Thanks for the verification. util-linux builds cleanly here with an
updated chroot, so I agree.