Wolfgang, thanks so much for testing. I asked Dave Morley on IRC and he
confirmed that his system that he tested the Hardy version on is amd64.
I was afraid when I backported the fix that the rest of zsync 0.5
wasn't 64bit clean, as a number of the changes between 0.5 and 0.6
(karmic's version) looked like they addressed such issues. They are
also too invasive IMO for an SRU, but I'll prepare a backport to
mitigate bug 412413.
Martin, I think it's still worth keeping this SRU, as it improves the
situation for amd64 users, and doesn't appear to create any regressions
for i386 users.
Wolfgang, thanks so much for testing. I asked Dave Morley on IRC and he
confirmed that his system that he tested the Hardy version on is amd64.
I was afraid when I backported the fix that the rest of zsync 0.5
wasn't 64bit clean, as a number of the changes between 0.5 and 0.6
(karmic's version) looked like they addressed such issues. They are
also too invasive IMO for an SRU, but I'll prepare a backport to
mitigate bug 412413.
Martin, I think it's still worth keeping this SRU, as it improves the
situation for amd64 users, and doesn't appear to create any regressions
for i386 users.