Assuming that X doesn't try to use sigaction (rather than signal) on SIGALRM somewhere else, this patch looks fine for dapper-proposed. Bryce/Timo, would you look into preparing an update, please?
Assuming that X doesn't try to use sigaction (rather than signal) on SIGALRM somewhere else, this patch looks fine for dapper-proposed. Bryce/Timo, would you look into preparing an update, please?