I can confirm this behaviour:
spriggsj@spriggsj-laptop:~$ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu maverick (development branch) Release: 10.10 Codename: maverick spriggsj@spriggsj-laptop:~$ apt-cache policy unity unity: Installed: 0.2.14-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 0.2.14-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 0.2.14-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
In addition, an example of one program which duplicates this bug is the current version of Firefox
spriggsj@spriggsj-laptop:~$ apt-cache policy firefox firefox: Installed: 3.6.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 3.6.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 3.6.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
I can confirm this behaviour:
spriggsj@ spriggsj- laptop: ~$ lsb_release -a spriggsj- laptop: ~$ apt-cache policy unity gb.archive. ubuntu. com/ubuntu/ maverick/main Packages dpkg/status
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu maverick (development branch)
Release: 10.10
Codename: maverick
spriggsj@
unity:
Installed: 0.2.14-0ubuntu1
Candidate: 0.2.14-0ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 0.2.14-0ubuntu1 0
500 http://
100 /var/lib/
In addition, an example of one program which duplicates this bug is the current version of Firefox
spriggsj@ spriggsj- laptop: ~$ apt-cache policy firefox -0ubuntu1 -0ubuntu1 -0ubuntu1 0 gb.archive. ubuntu. com/ubuntu/ maverick/main Packages dpkg/status
firefox:
Installed: 3.6.6+nobinonly
Candidate: 3.6.6+nobinonly
Version table:
*** 3.6.6+nobinonly
500 http://
100 /var/lib/