Ubuntu
ufw package

  1. Bug #337705
  2. Comment #7

Comment 7 for bug 337705

Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote :

> It seem like the problem is that our default python packaging makes
> it difficult to have stuff available during upgrade.

I don't see this. could you elaborate?

some issues:

 - the postinst script tries to restart ufw, before the symlinks are created, however this should not be an issue, now that the symlinks are included in the 2.6 version. the intrepid package has a problem with this, afaics.

 - Is there a need for placing ufw's library files in sys.path?