Comment 1 for bug 505406

Investigating further, I see that most of the images seem to have problems. I've now looked through all but 6; I'll do the rest tomorrow.

The problems I found are as follows:

"O Life" (http://www.flickr.com/photos/irsen_flow/3806685902 ), "Bay" (http://www.flickr.com/photos/fstopper/2950042567/ ), "Frog" (http://www.flickr.com/photos/fstopper/3718165490/ ), and "Shoes" (http://www.flickr.com/photos/letoloke/2752418092/ ), " are labeled as All-rights-reserved on flickr -- so we'll need to track down what exactly license they agreed privately to offer to the Ubuntu project, or ask them again.

 "White Orchid" ( http://www.flickr.com/photos/forteller/48036068/ ), "Flor de Loto" (http://www.flickr.com/photos/pablomeneses/3218431048/ ), "Grass in A" (http://www.flickr.com/photos/andrewkneebone/3544313849/ ), Naranja" (http://www.flickr.com/photos/teleyinex/2945647308/ ), and "Palmengarten" (http://www.flickr.com/photos/rene-germany/1478690483/ ) are under CC-BY-SA-2.0 on flickr, not CC-BY-2.0, so we'll need to either get them changed, or include both licenses in the copyright file.

"Misty Morning" (http://www.flickr.com/photos/piotrzurek/1399412798/ ) is under CC-BY-NC-SA-2.0 on flickr, which isn't even acceptable for Ubuntu, I think. We'll need to check on that.

And "Butterfly.jpg" has no mention in the AUTHORS file at all, isn't in the Ubuntu Artwork Karmic Release Shortlist pool on Flickr, and isn't findable through TinEye (reverse image source). We need a source and license for this one.