> It is on the filesystem, and from reading the code it looks as if
> timedated will error out if it is present and can't be written to.
> So as long as this is the case, we absolutely do.
No, absolutely *not*. Do not pile more hacks on top of hacks. It is a bug
that /etc/adjtime is present, and it is a bug that timedated attempts to
manipulate it in Ubuntu.
> Missed this.
> It is on the filesystem, and from reading the code it looks as if
> timedated will error out if it is present and can't be written to.
> So as long as this is the case, we absolutely do.
No, absolutely *not*. Do not pile more hacks on top of hacks. It is a bug
that /etc/adjtime is present, and it is a bug that timedated attempts to
manipulate it in Ubuntu.