> Correct, apparmor is not installed and never was.
Interesting, because it seems to be enabled. The systemd service would not have failed to load the apparmor profile if apparmor were disabled[1]:
This setting has no effect if AppArmor is not enabled.
Do you have the /sys/kernel/security/apparmor/profiles file, and does it have a list of loaded profiles by any chance?
In any case, the fix here seems to be to change the AppArmorProfile=ubuntu_pro_apt_news line to AppArmorProfile=-ubuntu_pro_apt_news in the apt_news.service unit file, but I'm trying to understand the situation a bit better before doing that. I didn't think apparmor could be enabled without the apparmor package installed on the system.
> Correct, apparmor is not installed and never was.
Interesting, because it seems to be enabled. The systemd service would not have failed to load the apparmor profile if apparmor were disabled[1]:
This setting has no effect if AppArmor is not enabled.
Do you have the /sys/kernel/ security/ apparmor/ profiles file, and does it have a list of loaded profiles by any chance?
In any case, the fix here seems to be to change the AppArmorProfile =ubuntu_ pro_apt_ news line to AppArmorProfile =-ubuntu_ pro_apt_ news in the apt_news.service unit file, but I'm trying to understand the situation a bit better before doing that. I didn't think apparmor could be enabled without the apparmor package installed on the system.
1. https:/ /www.freedeskto p.org/software/ systemd/ man/latest/ systemd. exec.html# AppArmorProfile =