Correct. I think you are using with 5.3 kernel or using workaround option. Without dptfxtract output or user manually created thermal-conf.xml or using aurogenerated, this is risky to play with power as the skin will hit limit.
Thanks, Srinivas
On Thu, 2019-08-15 at 16:28 +0000, Anthony Wong wrote: > @Srinivas > It doesn't look too good on thermald 1.9 until dptfxtract is used. > > * Result of thermald 1.9 only: > - > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sSZe2gqfM8NWqaDyUfXx-Q2iGUkKvrREjJsobHfIZiQ/edit#gid=980670338 > > * Result of thermald 1.9 + dptfxtract 1.4.2: > - > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sSZe2gqfM8NWqaDyUfXx-Q2iGUkKvrREjJsobHfIZiQ/edit#gid=1205697583 >
Correct.
I think you are using with 5.3 kernel or using workaround option.
Without dptfxtract output or user manually created thermal-conf.xml or
using aurogenerated, this is risky to play with power as the skin will
hit limit.
Thanks,
Srinivas
On Thu, 2019-08-15 at 16:28 +0000, Anthony Wong wrote: /docs.google. com/spreadsheet s/d/1sSZe2gqfM8 NWqaDyUfXx- Q2iGUkKvrREjJso bHfIZiQ/ edit#gid= 980670338 /docs.google. com/spreadsheet s/d/1sSZe2gqfM8 NWqaDyUfXx- Q2iGUkKvrREjJso bHfIZiQ/ edit#gid= 1205697583
> @Srinivas
> It doesn't look too good on thermald 1.9 until dptfxtract is used.
>
> * Result of thermald 1.9 only:
> -
> https:/
>
> * Result of thermald 1.9 + dptfxtract 1.4.2:
> -
> https:/
>