> I'm running a system without network-manager, without netplan, without
> resolvconf. Only ifupdown and dhclient. I expect /etc/resolv.conf to be
> updated by the logic in /sbin/dhclient-script where it (correctly, in my
> system) assumes it is the only source of dns servers. I have reopened
> the bug.
I repeat myself:
Flexibility for flexibility's sake is not a goal of Ubuntu.
That you have disabled a base component of Ubuntu and the resulting system does not function as you expect is not a valid bug report against Ubuntu.
If there are scenarios where it is not appropriate to run resolved, then we
should absolutely evaluate those and determine how they should be supported
in Ubuntu. However, they must be evaluated on their own merits, which means
that the technical details must be presented for consideration.
> I'm running a system without network-manager, without netplan, without script where it (correctly, in my
> resolvconf. Only ifupdown and dhclient. I expect /etc/resolv.conf to be
> updated by the logic in /sbin/dhclient-
> system) assumes it is the only source of dns servers. I have reopened
> the bug.
I repeat myself:
Flexibility for flexibility's sake is not a goal of Ubuntu.
That you have disabled a base component of Ubuntu and the resulting system does not function as you expect is not a valid bug report against Ubuntu.
If there are scenarios where it is not appropriate to run resolved, then we
should absolutely evaluate those and determine how they should be supported
in Ubuntu. However, they must be evaluated on their own merits, which means
that the technical details must be presented for consideration.