I was recently pinging that, as it wasn't merged into the qemu 6.0-rc
Do you have any more insight why this is held back still?
If I might ask - how does the kernel fix you referenced interact with this proposed qemu change?
Assumptions (please correct me):
1. with the qemu change and using that Rome-v2 it would ask to expose both features and no more crash (even on unfixed kernels)
2. with the kernel fix it will no more crash, even with an unfixed qemu?
Thanks Babu/Igor for chiming in!
@Babu /lists. gnu.org/ archive/ html/qemu- devel/2021- 03/msg01020. html
That exposed STIBP but not IBRS - isn't that what you tried to solve (for userspace) in qemu via a v2 for the Rome chips?
=> https:/
I was recently pinging that, as it wasn't merged into the qemu 6.0-rc
Do you have any more insight why this is held back still?
If I might ask - how does the kernel fix you referenced interact with this proposed qemu change?
Assumptions (please correct me):
1. with the qemu change and using that Rome-v2 it would ask to expose both features and no more crash (even on unfixed kernels)
2. with the kernel fix it will no more crash, even with an unfixed qemu?