I have managed to prepare the static build without PIE on top the latest artful version [1].
I have added the results to the same spreadsheet. What I've found particularly interesting are the results of the python_startup & python_startup_no_site tests. In subsequent runs (the result in the spreadsheet was for the second run of the testsuite) the improvement is really significant.
I believe this is thanks to the fact that the relative addresses don't need to be patched before running the binary.
In case of the rest of the tests: there are some small improvements as well as some minor performance decreases.
I have managed to prepare the static build without PIE on top the latest artful version [1].
I have added the results to the same spreadsheet. What I've found particularly interesting are the results of the python_startup & python_ startup_ no_site tests. In subsequent runs (the result in the spreadsheet was for the second run of the testsuite) the improvement is really significant.
I believe this is thanks to the fact that the relative addresses don't need to be patched before running the binary.
In case of the rest of the tests: there are some small improvements as well as some minor performance decreases.
[1] ppa:dgadomski/ pyperf (python2.7 - 2.7.14- 2ubuntu3~ lp1638695~ 4)