Comment 10 for bug 297408

I really need to have a chat to the PAM maintainers about having this implemented in mainline pam. In any case, the patch at the top compiles cleanly with 10.4 packages. I've built a bunch of packages, which are listed below - only the first one should actually matter;

http://tin.murrell.co.nz/~edward/pam/ubuntu/10.4/libpam-modules_1.1.1-2ubuntu5-ekm1_i386.deb

http://tin.murrell.co.nz/~edward/pam/ubuntu/10.4/libpam0g_1.1.1-2ubuntu5-ekm1_i386.deb
http://tin.murrell.co.nz/~edward/pam/ubuntu/10.4/libpam0g-dev_1.1.1-2ubuntu5-ekm1_i386.deb
http://tin.murrell.co.nz/~edward/pam/ubuntu/10.4/libpam-cracklib_1.1.1-2ubuntu5-ekm1_i386.deb
http://tin.murrell.co.nz/~edward/pam/ubuntu/10.4/libpam-doc_1.1.1-2ubuntu5-ekm1_all.deb
http://tin.murrell.co.nz/~edward/pam/ubuntu/10.4/libpam-runtime_1.1.1-2ubuntu5-ekm1_all.deb

NOTE: Other than some very basic checking to make sure it works as advertised and doesn't immediately explode on usage , I have done exactly zero testing of the above packages. If you are using these in a production environment, please test them properly before rolling out.