Comment 1 for bug 1875697

Revision history for this message
Rafael David Tinoco (rafaeldtinoco) wrote :

(c)rafaeldtinoco@devel:~$ rmadison openldap
 openldap | 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 | precise | source
 openldap | 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4.6 | precise-security | source
 openldap | 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4.6 | precise-updates | source
 openldap | 2.4.31-1+nmu2ubuntu8 | trusty | source
 openldap | 2.4.31-1+nmu2ubuntu8.4 | trusty-security | source
 openldap | 2.4.31-1+nmu2ubuntu8.5 | trusty-updates | source
 openldap | 2.4.42+dfsg-2ubuntu3 | xenial | source
 openldap | 2.4.42+dfsg-2ubuntu3.6 | xenial-security | source
 openldap | 2.4.42+dfsg-2ubuntu3.7 | xenial-updates | source
 openldap | 2.4.45+dfsg-1ubuntu1 | bionic | source
 openldap | 2.4.45+dfsg-1ubuntu1.3 | bionic-security | source
 openldap | 2.4.45+dfsg-1ubuntu1.4 | bionic-updates | source
 openldap | 2.4.47+dfsg-3ubuntu2 | disco | source
 openldap | 2.4.47+dfsg-3ubuntu2.1 | disco-security | source
 openldap | 2.4.47+dfsg-3ubuntu2.2 | disco-updates | source
 openldap | 2.4.48+dfsg-1ubuntu1 | eoan | source
 openldap | 2.4.49+dfsg-2ubuntu1 | focal | source
 openldap | 2.4.49+dfsg-2ubuntu1 | groovy | source

Since we haven't synced with dfsg-3 for focal, I'm marking this as server-next for groovy. For next merge, I would suggest this to be SRUed for Focal as well, and leave for the SRU team to decide. Since its a very small change, I'm flagging as blocking next SRU to focal, perhaps one can add it to the next SRU.