> No, and I don't think I was even aware of this issue. AFAIK, u-s-s-o-a > is building fine in all architectures... Do you have a link to the failure?
I'm basing it on this: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#online-accounts-api
"libonline-accounts-daemon1/s390x unsatisfiable Depends: libonline-accounts-client1"
libonline-accounts-daemon1 exists for s390x, but presumably one of its dependencies can't be satisfied. So o-a-a is stuck in limbo.
> No, and I don't think I was even aware of this issue. AFAIK, u-s-s-o-a
> is building fine in all architectures... Do you have a link to the failure?
I'm basing it on this: people. canonical. com/~ubuntu- archive/ proposed- migration/ update_ excuses. html#online- accounts- api
http://
"libonline- accounts- daemon1/ s390x unsatisfiable Depends: libonline- accounts- client1"
libonline- accounts- daemon1 exists for s390x, but presumably one of its dependencies can't be satisfied. So o-a-a is stuck in limbo.