On 07/14/2011 01:58 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
>> is this seen on the armhf port too?
> Should I understand that Ubuntu armel = Debian armhf?
both are built for the armv7-a architecture. Ubuntu armel for the soft-float
ABI, Debian armhf for the hard float ABI.
>> trying to figure out if it's a linker or an assembler issue, could
>> you try to build with new as and old ld, and old as and new ld?
>
> - new as, old ld: the resulting binary doesn't segfault
> - old as, new ld: the resulting binary segfaults
that would suggest a faulty linker, using binutils-gold does work indeed in
oneiric. otoh, the same linker versions works ok in unstable.
On 07/14/2011 01:58 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
>> is this seen on the armhf port too?
> Should I understand that Ubuntu armel = Debian armhf?
both are built for the armv7-a architecture. Ubuntu armel for the soft-float
ABI, Debian armhf for the hard float ABI.
>> trying to figure out if it's a linker or an assembler issue, could
>> you try to build with new as and old ld, and old as and new ld?
>
> - new as, old ld: the resulting binary doesn't segfault
> - old as, new ld: the resulting binary segfaults
that would suggest a faulty linker, using binutils-gold does work indeed in
oneiric. otoh, the same linker versions works ok in unstable.