Comment 6 for bug 1019444

Revision history for this message
Scott Kitterman (kitterman) wrote :

<ScottK> mdeslaur: Would it make sense to copy the mesa in precise-proposed to -updates and you base off of that? Except for your comment about the security issue, it's otherwise ready to release.
<mdeslaur> ScottK: huh? bryce said there are issues with the package in -proposed
<ScottK> Hmm.
<ScottK> All the bugs are marked verified.
<mdeslaur> ScottK: well, if that's the case, it should get pushed to -updates
<ScottK> bryce: Should I remove mesa from precise-proposed so it doesn't get released by accident?
-*- ScottK waits for bryce.
<bryce> ScottK, there are no known user issues. The problem is that a couple test cases changed behavior. According to Intel those are test suite issues not indications of user affecting problems
<ScottK> So you'd recommend to release it?
<bryce> ScottK, I'd have no problem releasing it. It works fine on the hardware, aside from the piglit irregularities (which would be hard to track down)