(In reply to comment #27)
> (In reply to comment #26)
> > No gcc-5 doesn't default to C++11 and the issue here has nothing to do with
> > C++98 vs. C++11.
> >
> > Please try to get the facts strait, before posting long misleading replies.
>
> This is what most of the documentation, email threads and conversations I
> had seem to point at. If you have a different opinion, than by all means,
> please share your knowledge.
(In reply to comment #27)
> (In reply to comment #26)
> > No gcc-5 doesn't default to C++11 and the issue here has nothing to do with
> > C++98 vs. C++11.
> >
> > Please try to get the facts strait, before posting long misleading replies.
>
> This is what most of the documentation, email threads and conversations I
> had seem to point at. If you have a different opinion, than by all means,
> please share your knowledge.
The relevant issue is whether libstdc++'s _GLIBCXX_ USE_CXX11_ ABI is enabled by default, see <https:/ /gcc.gnu. org/onlinedocs/ libstdc+ +/manual/ using_dual_ abi.html>.