On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Clint Byrum <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> Right now the issue that was reported originally is definitely fixed from
> the point of view of many of those who reported they were affected
I took Ubuntu 10.04 off my little home network because of this bug after
suffering with it for too long and trying all "fixes". I don't know if the
bug would still persist on my machines with the latest Ubuntu but a flaw in
the startup code is not something I would tolerate for long. (I came to
Ubuntu from NetBSD --- you know it's reputation for quality --- and moved on
from Ubuntu to Archlinux which has worked out well for me).
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Clint Byrum <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> Right now the issue that was reported originally is definitely fixed from
> the point of view of many of those who reported they were affected
I took Ubuntu 10.04 off my little home network because of this bug after
suffering with it for too long and trying all "fixes". I don't know if the
bug would still persist on my machines with the latest Ubuntu but a flaw in
the startup code is not something I would tolerate for long. (I came to
Ubuntu from NetBSD --- you know it's reputation for quality --- and moved on
from Ubuntu to Archlinux which has worked out well for me).