On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 06:39:25PM -0000, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Importance set based on the apparent difficulty of reporducing the
> failure (one reported occurrence, under heavy load); but feel free to
> raise the importance if appropriate.
I would like to add that my system has been plenty stable on the whole with
recent Jaunty kernels including .39. The only graphics-related change which
went into .40 was reverted in .41, so I don't suspect this is a regression,
but probably a rare bug.
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 06:39:25PM -0000, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Importance set based on the apparent difficulty of reporducing the
> failure (one reported occurrence, under heavy load); but feel free to
> raise the importance if appropriate.
I would like to add that my system has been plenty stable on the whole with
recent Jaunty kernels including .39. The only graphics-related change which
went into .40 was reverted in .41, so I don't suspect this is a regression,
but probably a rare bug.
--
- mdz