Comment 10 for bug 1707409

>I agree on 384 being getrandom and there are other cases like [1].

I did the same research :)

>I don't know details but would consider the pure lack of the system call support a feature request to >upstream qemu.
>We could add a qemu upstream task here for that FR - in the worst case we are told why we are wrong - >opinions?

yes please!

>On the case itself for now I'd recommend to get back the section:
>ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),armhf)
> TERM=vt100 dh_auto_test || true
>
>Which maybe was there for similar reasons.

I think this used to hang the builders, IIRC, but seems to pass now
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/332584378/buildlog_ubuntu-artful-armhf.notmuch_0.25-4ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz

uploaded in artful

G.