Comment 43 for bug 96480

So you are basically telling me that "serious architectural changes" have been backported from 12 -> 13 about 3 weeks before release during stabilize phase? It's the first time that I have a non bootable kernel since my slackware times long ago. Also how can we be so sure it only does affect "a few" people since that change was only 3 weeks ago?! First no response from ubuntu kernel folks for 2 weeks and then lowering the prio to medium and tell us we should just stick with -12 (forcing me to old nvidia-glx as well)? Why do you vendor patch what should be a stable kernel if you *seem* to not have a clue whats going on upstream. I appreciate all you efforts and I *love* ubuntu but this all really leaves me totally disappointed.