Comment 40 for bug 8050

(In reply to comment #39)
> One other thing I should mention. In the /etc/mod(utils|probe.d)/alsa-base
> files that shipped with alsa-base 1.0.8-1 the list of options lines is
> different from the one I presented earlier (... IIRC; I am on a Windows
> machine right now and can't check). In particular, I think that the
> line for snd-bt87x-overclock is absent because this driver is disabled in
> the 1.0.8-1 release. The list may change in 1.0.8-2 too, depending on
> what I find out about the snd-bt87x-overclock driver.
>
> Just a heads up in case Ubuntu is doing work parallel to Debian's.

Is 1.0.8 a fairly safe thing to bring into a release which is headed for
stabilization? (e.g., do you consider it appropriate for Sarge)?

If, in your opinion, it's a reasonably safe thing to do, then I'm fine with
bringing it into Hoary.