(In reply to comment #8)
> Martin, seems that Debian used this patch ... any opinion on it?
It's not in the Debian changelog, but I didn't check the package.
Anyway, the current patch is a bit ugly since it is very specific. In general I
don't see a reason for having duplicate file names, so I'd just drop the camera
name detection.
(In reply to comment #8)
> Martin, seems that Debian used this patch ... any opinion on it?
It's not in the Debian changelog, but I didn't check the package.
Anyway, the current patch is a bit ugly since it is very specific. In general I
don't see a reason for having duplicate file names, so I'd just drop the camera
name detection.