Comment 3 for bug 1867996

Revision history for this message
Paul G (paulieg) wrote :

So, the patch is wrong. It fixes *a* bug, but not *the* bug. There appear to be multiple g_signal_emit calls that don't match the definition of the g_signals they're emitting. See: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/65885

Unless I'm missing something, they all need to be fixed. I will audit them all, put together a patch, test it and report on results. Absent feedback from someone who actually knows g_signals and gobject in general, this ought to show whether I've misunderstood something or not.