I.e. I don't think they're competing (iPXE calls itself "firmware", not "bootloader"); they have very different focus and cover different and in many cases complementary needs.
Of course I can respect the policy not to sign anything other than grub, though.
I will document the need to disable secure boot in the installations that will require iPXE.
> If there are features missing from grub, that should be addressed as a bug in grub.
This is a list of network cards that iPXE supports: /github. com/ipxe/ ipxe/tree/ master/ src/drivers/ net
https:/
I don't think Grub would ever accept a "bug report" to include all the iPXE drivers in order to be able to cope with e.g. the following scenario:
"My onboard NIC failed/wasn't gigabit/whatever and I replaced it.
Of course my firmware doesn't know how to netboot the new NIC, so I need iPXE."
> signing multiple competing bootloader implementations
I.e. I don't think they're competing (iPXE calls itself "firmware", not "bootloader"); they have very different focus and cover different and in many cases complementary needs.
Of course I can respect the policy not to sign anything other than grub, though.
I will document the need to disable secure boot in the installations that will require iPXE.
Thank you for all the input!