Comment 17 for bug 568164

Hi Clint,

Should I update my existing branch or sumbit a new one?

Cheers.

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Clint Byrum <email address hidden> wrote:
> This needs the regression potential stated more clearly in the
> description before it hits -updates (though on reviewing the patch it
> appears quite small, which is why I've accepted it into -proposed).
>
> ** Changed in: iptraf (Ubuntu Maverick)
>       Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568164
>
> Title:
>  iptraf stop showes eth0/eth1 interface
>
> Status in “iptraf” package in Ubuntu:
>  Fix Committed
> Status in “iptraf” source package in Lucid:
>  Fix Committed
> Status in “iptraf” source package in Maverick:
>  Fix Committed
> Status in “iptraf” source package in Natty:
>  Fix Committed
> Status in “iptraf” package in Fedora:
>  Unknown
>
> Bug description:
>  TEST CASE:
>  1 use a system with two network interfaces (not sure if that is actually needed to trigger the bug, one may be enough)
>  2 run "sudo iptraf"
>  3 select "Ip trafic monitor" from the menu
>  4 verify that only "all interfaces" and "lo" show up
>  5 install the version from -proposed
>  6 repeat 2,3
>  7 verify that this time something like eth0, wlan0 etc appear
>
>  Binary package hint: iptraf
>
>  after upgrade from karmic to lucid, the IPtraf stops showes me
>  eth0/eth1 interface, I can see them from "all" but the ability to
>  watch specifiliy for an interface is lost.
>
>  iptraf -i eth0 works fine otherwise.
>
>  iptraf -u doesn't show it either.
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptraf/+bug/568164/+subscribe
>