I'm sure I don't understand the complexities of the lib32 packaging process,
but I know on my system just using the standard 32bit version of
libasound_module_conf_pulse.so works.
It *was* my belief that the lib32 libs are just repackaged builds of the
32bit libs. It sounds like that is not the case but considering it works,
why not do just that?
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Luke Yelavich
<email address hidden>wrote:
> The solution would be to build a lib32pulse package, which is what will
> happen. However this is far from trivial.
>
> --
> libasound_module_conf_pulse.so is missing from lib32asound-plugins
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408615
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
I'm sure I don't understand the complexities of the lib32 packaging process, module_ conf_pulse. so works.
but I know on my system just using the standard 32bit version of
libasound_
It *was* my belief that the lib32 libs are just repackaged builds of the
32bit libs. It sounds like that is not the case but considering it works,
why not do just that?
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Luke Yelavich
<email address hidden>wrote:
> The solution would be to build a lib32pulse package, which is what will module_ conf_pulse. so is missing from lib32asound-plugins /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 408615
> happen. However this is far from trivial.
>
> --
> libasound_
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>