Comment 4 for bug 1078106

Revision history for this message
Adam Conrad (adconrad) wrote :

I'm not sure where mterry gets the idea that this bogus lintian warning is unique:

E: udev: postrm-does-not-call-updaterc.d-for-init.d-script etc/init.d/udev-finish
E: udev: postrm-does-not-call-updaterc.d-for-init.d-script etc/init.d/udev

It's just a by-product of the upstart-job symlink, yes, and we don't WANT to call update-rc.d for those, since we don't want rc?.d symlinks for them.