I'm not sure where mterry gets the idea that this bogus lintian warning is unique:
E: udev: postrm-does-not-call-updaterc.d-for-init.d-script etc/init.d/udev-finish E: udev: postrm-does-not-call-updaterc.d-for-init.d-script etc/init.d/udev
It's just a by-product of the upstart-job symlink, yes, and we don't WANT to call update-rc.d for those, since we don't want rc?.d symlinks for them.
I'm not sure where mterry gets the idea that this bogus lintian warning is unique:
E: udev: postrm- does-not- call-updaterc. d-for-init. d-script etc/init. d/udev- finish does-not- call-updaterc. d-for-init. d-script etc/init.d/udev
E: udev: postrm-
It's just a by-product of the upstart-job symlink, yes, and we don't WANT to call update-rc.d for those, since we don't want rc?.d symlinks for them.