Ubuntu
gvfs package

  1. Bug #1791693
  2. Comment #4

Comment 4 for bug 1791693

Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Ok, thanks for the explanation in comment #1, otherwise I'd be worried about that particular entry. I approve of the FFe. Just be sure to test a few of its reverse-dependencies, since I see the list is pretty big (not sure to what extent most of them actually use gvfs though).