Comment 23 for bug 1928674
Revision history for this message
| Julian Andres Klode (juliank) wrote | #23 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
I think we discussed this yesterday that we need to properly test this. A smoke test on amd64 is not adequate, we also need to ensure additionally that
- there are no regressions on arm64
install update in canonistack server and reboot it and make sure it boots.
- there are no regressions in (maas) netbooting.
I don't know how to verify nicely. I have a script you can point at shim and grub efi binaries to
boot them similar to MAAS, but there might be more regressions, I clearly can't cover them all :)
Due to the toolchain being different in the rebuilds happening in bionic/focal instead of hirsute, with much older binutils, and missing patches in gcc-8 likely. Because we know that at least shim did not work with old toolchain at all, so are a bit scared :D