On Fri, 28 Sep 2018, 20:20 John Lenton, <email address hidden> wrote:
> What can we do about architectures that need gccgo?
>
To be clear, the only such architecture is powerpc on xenial.
For snapd, my understanding is having snapd there does not offer anyone
anything - there has never been a core snap published for powerpc has there?
The most pragmatic thing to do would be to remove snapd/powerpc from xenial
although I don't quite know how that would work. I guess a less nuclear
option would be to just build an empty snapd package on powerpc.
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018, 20:20 John Lenton, <email address hidden> wrote:
> What can we do about architectures that need gccgo?
>
To be clear, the only such architecture is powerpc on xenial.
For snapd, my understanding is having snapd there does not offer anyone
anything - there has never been a core snap published for powerpc has there?
The most pragmatic thing to do would be to remove snapd/powerpc from xenial
although I don't quite know how that would work. I guess a less nuclear
option would be to just build an empty snapd package on powerpc.
>