On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 08:48:35PM -0000, Michael Terry wrote:
> Looks mostly fine.
>
> - There are several build warnings about potentially uninitialized variables. I didn't look into whether they were problems or not. No need to fix, but maybe they should be looked into.
> - There are a couple crash reports in LP. Any actual problems there?
They seem to be for a previous version, but we'll keep an eye on it.
> - I get the following warning on startup: e-data-server-WARNING **: e_module_load_all_in_directory: Error opening directory '/usr/lib/evolution-data-server/credential-modules': No such file or directory. Are we missing some files or support for something?
They come from the evolution-data-server-online-accounts package, which
is usually brought in as a recommends of evolution-data-server. I guess
you don't have one or the other installed, and we should probably think
about making the latter a dep of gnome-calendar.
> Otherwise packaging seems good and we are in sync with Debian. GNOME
> and the desktop team will maintain well I'm sure. But maybe just a
> comment on at least that last problem first?
Thanks Mike.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 08:48:35PM -0000, Michael Terry wrote:
> Looks mostly fine.
>
> - There are several build warnings about potentially uninitialized variables. I didn't look into whether they were problems or not. No need to fix, but maybe they should be looked into.
> - There are a couple crash reports in LP. Any actual problems there?
They seem to be for a previous version, but we'll keep an eye on it.
> - I get the following warning on startup: e-data- server- WARNING **: e_module_ load_all_ in_directory: Error opening directory '/usr/lib/ evolution- data-server/ credential- modules' : No such file or directory. Are we missing some files or support for something?
They come from the evolution- data-server- online- accounts package, which data-server. I guess
is usually brought in as a recommends of evolution-
you don't have one or the other installed, and we should probably think
about making the latter a dep of gnome-calendar.
> Otherwise packaging seems good and we are in sync with Debian. GNOME
> and the desktop team will maintain well I'm sure. But maybe just a
> comment on at least that last problem first?
--
Iain Lane [ <email address hidden> ]
Debian Developer [ <email address hidden> ]
Ubuntu Developer [ <email address hidden> ]