On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 12:47:20PM -0000, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> Oh, maybe the test case is wrong. This SRU is the same fix as was done
> in Debian's 5.1.1 (present in Xenial) to "not ship broken symlinks".
>
> See https://bugs.debian.org/732272 and comment #2
Different considerations apply to the development release, of course.
But if that is what is proposed to be done in Trusty, why is the SRU
needed at all? This "fix" won't solve anything for the user, will it?
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 12:47:20PM -0000, Jeremy Bicha wrote: /bugs.debian. org/732272 and comment #2
> Oh, maybe the test case is wrong. This SRU is the same fix as was done
> in Debian's 5.1.1 (present in Xenial) to "not ship broken symlinks".
>
> See https:/
Different considerations apply to the development release, of course.
But if that is what is proposed to be done in Trusty, why is the SRU
needed at all? This "fix" won't solve anything for the user, will it?