(In reply to Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) from comment #57)
> Supporting the new methods for detecting settings is by definition new and
> therefore not thoroughly tested. It seems reasonable to put this through
> the same QA process as any new feature.
It's not a feature that's serious regression. the patch is on trunk for a while and there's no any known regression. I suggest to ask for aurora approval.
(In reply to Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) from comment #57)
> Supporting the new methods for detecting settings is by definition new and
> therefore not thoroughly tested. It seems reasonable to put this through
> the same QA process as any new feature.
It's not a feature that's serious regression. the patch is on trunk for a while and there's no any known regression. I suggest to ask for aurora approval.