Comment 9 for bug 148084

Sergey, Pablo, this is great! Thanks for your efforts.

Some comments about the changes:
i) the new gnome-archive-install script would preferably be declared as a _SCRIPT rather than _DATA, and needs not be invoked with python (as it has a shebang); see also http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=565879 which is about fixing the way isoinfo.sh is run and declared in Makefile.am

ii) the three new errors returning FR_PROC_ERROR_GENERIC, FR_PROC_ERROR_FORMAT_NOT_SUPPORTED, and FR_PROC_ERROR_GENERIC respectively all have the same description; would be best to use a different message for each error case so that we can easily identify the error when we receive bug reports with this message

iii) I'd like to find a way to upstream this; I expect GNOME upstream would rather have a PackageKit implementation (and for now I think Ubuntu would be best with this gnome-app-install based implementation), so perhaps it makes sense to have this plugin conditionally built, or use a wrapper which dispatches between a (to be written) PK implementation and our GAI one? Please share your thoughts!

iv) The patch requires some packaging changes (python policy compliance, new deps etc.), but I can take care of that