if by Z+1 you mean Zesty, I have attached the patch for zesty and Dan nominated it for zesty but we are waiting for someone with permissions to confirm it.
+Description: Use real locking in ebtables
+ Prior use of locking by file exclusive access is inadequate
+ because if ebtables crashes or is killed it will leave a
+ stale lock file behind which then blocks new ebtables from
+ running.
+Author: <email address hidden>
+Bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ebtables/+bug/1645324
+---
+This patch header follows DEP-3: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/
+Index: ebtables-2.0.10.4/libebtc.c
@Robie-
Hi Robie-
if by Z+1 you mean Zesty, I have attached the patch for zesty and Dan nominated it for zesty but we are waiting for someone with permissions to confirm it.
I also filed a bug with upstream Debian: /bugs.debian. org/cgi- bin/bugreport. cgi?bug= 860590
https:/
The DEP-3 header is in the diff:
+Description: Use real locking in ebtables /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ ebtables/ +bug/1645324 dep.debian. net/deps/ dep3/ 2.0.10. 4/libebtc. c
+ Prior use of locking by file exclusive access is inadequate
+ because if ebtables crashes or is killed it will leave a
+ stale lock file behind which then blocks new ebtables from
+ running.
+Author: <email address hidden>
+Bug: https:/
+---
+This patch header follows DEP-3: http://
+Index: ebtables-
Is that what you are looking for?
Thanks