For the drupal6 debdiffs, I examined the patch to fix SA-CORE-2010-002; the only difference that I could see between it and the upstream commit at http://git.drupalfr.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=core/new-date.git;a=commitdiff;h=d9e273d82fd427115642f2e6c2fbefcb661a2115 was that the dpatch had dropped the changelog entry, VCS tag id updates, and a gratuitous whitespace change -- I do find it's helpful for reviewers when I adjust patches like that to add a note in the patch header that I've done so.
I adjusted the debian/changelog entries to give a better description of the issues and uploaded the packages to the security proposed ppa, again at https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security-proposed/+archive/ppa/ ; please test and report feedback here.
The drupal5 packages were mistakenly uploaded to the private security ppa; I copied them over to the public security-proposed ppa at https:/ /launchpad. net/~ubuntu- security- proposed/ +archive/ ppa/ ; please test and report feedback here.
For the drupal6 debdiffs, I examined the patch to fix SA-CORE-2010-002; the only difference that I could see between it and the upstream commit at http:// git.drupalfr. org/cgi- bin/gitweb. cgi?p=core/ new-date. git;a=commitdif f;h=d9e273d82fd 427115642f2e6c2 fbefcb661a2115 was that the dpatch had dropped the changelog entry, VCS tag id updates, and a gratuitous whitespace change -- I do find it's helpful for reviewers when I adjust patches like that to add a note in the patch header that I've done so.
I adjusted the debian/changelog entries to give a better description of the issues and uploaded the packages to the security proposed ppa, again at https:/ /launchpad. net/~ubuntu- security- proposed/ +archive/ ppa/ ; please test and report feedback here.
Thanks again!