Comment 97 for bug 1751460

(In reply to Michael Catanzaro from comment #39)
> (In reply to Daniel Kondor from comment #38)
> > My understanding is that the only way to fix this is to use PROT_NONE when
> > allocating address space and later use mprotect() before actually using it.
> > I understand that depending the structure of the code, that could be a lot
> > of work to do for a somewhat specialized use case.
>
> Yeah, that's exactly what needs to happen here. I took a look at this, but
> wasn't sure where the mprotect()s were needed.

I'm a bit worried about this approach in terms of performance...