Base cause for me was actively setting the root password to be
different from the initial
user password requested by the install wizard. apt was still trying to
use a copy of the
initial password, so variations of sudo su -, plus command line
aptitude calls saved the
day.
I still believe strongly in keeping that root password different and
secure, so I just got
used to the penalty of doing my updates in CLI (which I like anyway)
-steve
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Andrew Allcock <email address hidden> wrote:
> My report of this bug came from when I was using 11.04 Beta. This has
> not occurred to me in the full release but, if it helps, the full
> release is a dual-boot installation and upgraded from 10.10 whereas the
> beta release was an upgrade of a WUBI install.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (774286).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442941
>
> Title:
> debconf failed to upgrade from 1.5.27ubuntu1 to 1.5.27ubuntu2: exit
> status 128 - Use of uninitialized value $reply in scalar chomp at
> /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/FrontEnd/Passthrough.pm line 66
>
> Status in “debconf” package in Ubuntu:
> Confirmed
> Status in “tzdata” package in Ubuntu:
> Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: debconf
>
> Failed to report to debconf during first upgrade after installation of
> 9.10 beta. Upgrade failed.
>
> ProblemType: Package
> Architecture: amd64
> Date: Mon Oct 5 09:54:06 2009
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
> ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 128
> NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
> Package: debconf 1.5.27ubuntu2
> PackageArchitecture: all
> ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-11.36-generic
> SourcePackage: debconf
> Title: package debconf 1.5.27ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 128
> Uname: Linux 2.6.31-11-generic x86_64
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debconf/+bug/442941/+subscriptions
>
Base cause for me was actively setting the root password to be
different from the initial
user password requested by the install wizard. apt was still trying to
use a copy of the
initial password, so variations of sudo su -, plus command line
aptitude calls saved the
day.
I still believe strongly in keeping that root password different and
secure, so I just got
used to the penalty of doing my updates in CLI (which I like anyway)
-steve
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Andrew Allcock <email address hidden> wrote: /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 442941 perl5/Debconf/ FrontEnd/ Passthrough. pm line 66 dules: nvidia ture: all ature: Ubuntu 2.6.31- 11.36-generic /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ debconf/ +bug/442941/ +subscriptions
> My report of this bug came from when I was using 11.04 Beta. This has
> not occurred to me in the full release but, if it helps, the full
> release is a dual-boot installation and upgraded from 10.10 whereas the
> beta release was an upgrade of a WUBI install.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (774286).
> https:/
>
> Title:
> debconf failed to upgrade from 1.5.27ubuntu1 to 1.5.27ubuntu2: exit
> status 128 - Use of uninitialized value $reply in scalar chomp at
> /usr/share/
>
> Status in “debconf” package in Ubuntu:
> Confirmed
> Status in “tzdata” package in Ubuntu:
> Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: debconf
>
> Failed to report to debconf during first upgrade after installation of
> 9.10 beta. Upgrade failed.
>
> ProblemType: Package
> Architecture: amd64
> Date: Mon Oct 5 09:54:06 2009
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
> ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 128
> NonfreeKernelMo
> Package: debconf 1.5.27ubuntu2
> PackageArchitec
> ProcVersionSign
> SourcePackage: debconf
> Title: package debconf 1.5.27ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 128
> Uname: Linux 2.6.31-11-generic x86_64
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https:/
>