On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:17 AM, David Prieto wrote:
> Martin, I think most people here have agreed that fade is even better
> and less obstrusive than glide2. I proposed glide2 because I found it
> better than glide1, but even I think that fade would be better.
Yes, maybe we should just mark that as a dupe of this and alter the
descriptions / patch to fade.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:17 AM, David Prieto wrote:
> Martin, I think most people here have agreed that fade is even better
> and less obstrusive than glide2. I proposed glide2 because I found it
> better than glide1, but even I think that fade would be better.
Yes, maybe we should just mark that as a dupe of this and alter the
descriptions / patch to fade.