On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 14:49 +0000, Michael Vogt wrote:
> So it seems that the behaviour of the shell changed and it does no
> longer print a error message itself. I will let command-not-found print
> one.
Was that by design, or does someone need to file a bug upstream?
I'm thinking a bug... no news is good news, not the inverse...
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 14:49 +0000, Michael Vogt wrote:
> So it seems that the behaviour of the shell changed and it does no
> longer print a error message itself. I will let command-not-found print
> one.
Was that by design, or does someone need to file a bug upstream?
I'm thinking a bug... no news is good news, not the inverse...
--- MIke