Comment 18 for bug 1590688

Thanks Eero for the verification of the fix I added (starting freshclam again which was a regression.
You are right that clamav-daemon doesn't start for the reasons I outlined before of the condition being not met initially and not picked up later by systemd.

I'm not sure about a sleep-loop to fix this up but I really appreciate dropping the info for anyone who wants this. I'd expect a proper solution would be something where systemd is realizing that the condition is "now true" and starts it then.

Since that part is not a regression we should discuss and agree with Debian in how to do so.
I started the discussion before on the linked Debian bug, but regarding clamav-daemon not starting the response was "this is okay."
Would you mind opening a bug there or chiming in on the linked bug again to push your argument - I also already added several suggestions there how to start it, but they need some improvement for this "realizing later" that the condition is met.