Ubuntu
bacula package

  1. Bug #227613
  2. Comment #21

Comment 21 for bug 227613

Revision history for this message
Ante Karamatić (ivoks) wrote : Re: [Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd

On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 09:25:55 -0000
Kern Sibbald <email address hidden> wrote:

> OK, no problem. I didn't take offense, hope you didn't, but just
> wanted to clarify.

Of course not.

> The bug in the main Bacula 2.2.8 Branch HEAD is fixed because the
> code is identical to the current 2.4.2 code. That is if 2.2.8 is
> fully and correctly patched with the released patches, it should have
> this bug and others fixed. It is possible that there were confusions
> with the patches in getting from the first 2.2.8 to the version that
> is in the SVN.

Oh! Mea culpa... I didn't know 2.2.8 is still getting patches. I'm
checking out source as I write this...

> OK, if you have a 2.2.8 src/filed/backup.c that is the same as on
> 2.4.2, then the bug *should* be fixed. If not, I will be worried ...

I've seen your comments on bug in bacula buglist, but we really need
Sergio to confirm this.

Thank you for the info!