Using at with `-t` is well-defined and used. From the manpage of at from focal:
-t time run the job at time, given in the format [[CC]YY]MMDDhhmm[.ss]
But that doesn't work w/o this patch, that is, [.ss] is never respected. If I were to schedule a one-time job where I need the sub-minute precision, I could never get that done even though "at" says (and documents) that it's indeed possible.
With this patch (and SRU), that [.ss] is respected and "at" works again as documented. Let me know if you need more details. Thanks for taking a look.
Hi Robie,
Using at with `-t` is well-defined and used. From the manpage of at from focal: MMDDhhmm[ .ss]
-t time run the job at time, given in the format [[CC]YY]
But that doesn't work w/o this patch, that is, [.ss] is never respected. If I were to schedule a one-time job where I need the sub-minute precision, I could never get that done even though "at" says (and documents) that it's indeed possible.
With this patch (and SRU), that [.ss] is respected and "at" works again as documented. Let me know if you need more details. Thanks for taking a look.