On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 11:29 +0000, Martin Pitt wrote:
> -dbg packages are obsolete. We really do use 'debug debs' (.ddeb) that
> end in -dbgsym (see [1]).
Ahh. OK. So I should remove my -dbg packages?
> The 'auto-magically show a stack trace in the comment section for any
> attached apport report' bit is already covered by the bug reporting tool
> spec [2].
So the "show stack trace in launchpad" part is not yet done?
> So I dedicate this to integrating apport-retrace into the GUI frontend.
Indeed. Along with a "load debugging packages" option?
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 11:29 +0000, Martin Pitt wrote:
> -dbg packages are obsolete. We really do use 'debug debs' (.ddeb) that
> end in -dbgsym (see [1]).
Ahh. OK. So I should remove my -dbg packages?
> The 'auto-magically show a stack trace in the comment section for any
> attached apport report' bit is already covered by the bug reporting tool
> spec [2].
So the "show stack trace in launchpad" part is not yet done?
> So I dedicate this to integrating apport-retrace into the GUI frontend.
Indeed. Along with a "load debugging packages" option?
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell